A few follow-ups from my last post:
1) Gates looks like he will remain as Secretary of Defense.
2) More calls for prescription privileges to Pharmascists.
3) An interesting graph comparing the American Big Three with the Japanese Big Three.
4) Bush made a few pardons.
New comments:
1) I have favourable views of the Clinton, Holder, Axelrod, Geithner, Romer, Summers, and Volcker for their respective proposed positions. I feel much better now that Obama won’t do anything drastically protectionist given his team of economic advisers.
2) I like Obama’s civil rights agenda. Please note his approval of the repealing of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. It’s a silly policy that loses money and skilled members of the military.
3) I oppose the proposed new Ontario driving laws. At their core, they are blatantly ageist, and at the least should have been based on years of experience than age. Other issues are the negative impacts on car-pooling, and designated drivers. Again, it’s just MADD imposing their neo-prohibitionist and anti-civil liberties agenda on the public through lobbying. Shame on McGuinty. I’ve made known it long ago that I despise MADD, and I discourage anyone from donating to them given their policies and 81% overhead.
4) I oppose the cut to federal party public financing. I have mixed feelings about this though. Generally I despise public campaign funding. It’s absurd to just give out money to just anyone to campaign; you have to be able to produce some level of support, including monetary support. On the other hand, this is an after the election result tied to actual votes. It’s not a blind handout to any wannabee politician out there. It’s been highly advertised and people have factored it into their voting. It’s played a factor in getting people to vote for their party over compromising, and I can appreciate that goal.
The money is actually very little and for a program that I somewhat like. Of course, it will effectively kill the Green Party, who, having made significant gains in popular vote and running candidates in every riding should now be considered a notable federal party. I guess I sort of felt that the incentive helped to fight the paradox of voting. I tend to think this will have a negative effect on voter turn out, which is quickly becoming an issue we need to address.
Chrétien introduced the changes (to which, if I remember correctly, Martin has bashed for crippling the Liberal party) to end corporate and union donations, which I highly favour. I’ll note that I’m a Liberal Party member and supporter and, yes, my party does benefit from this financing. All parties do. Seems to me though like a political power move over relatively no money that disproportionately affects the opposition parties during a time when personal donations will be lower due to the recession.
I’ll defend Harper until my throat is sore over the responsible act of running a federal deficit, but this is a program that shouldn’t be cut. It’s not really pork, but allows for parties to develop new policy, well worth the money in a time when we need to think outside the box to fight this recession. To tie it to a confidence vote would be a political move that I think is petty when the parties should be working together on more inportant topics. Instead of eliminting this spending (be wary of reducing spending at all during recessions), eliminate the penny; that will save some money.
Currently Listening to: Lyin’ Eyes - Eagles
Random Wikipedia Article: Puntland
I’ve been pretty sick lately; spending most of my time in bed. This week has been particularly rough with an added resistant cold that even my Benylin with Codeine isn’t taking the edge off of. For the few friends who aren’t up to speed I’m waiting for a bed to open at a hospital, hopefully in the next few weeks.
All this time in bed has me making random notes on things that I’ve been meaning to mention. I have a constantly increasing bookmark folder of articles that I just haven’t been up to commenting on. So here’s a few things for me to cross of my list:
Congratulations to President-Elect Barack Obama and to the U.S.A.
Ohio is now off notice (For “going blue”). California is on notice (For passing “Prop 8″).
Levi gets the award for correctly predicting Obama due to his razor sharp reasoning that “Star Trek had a Black Captain before a Female one”.
Things I hope Obama does:
1) Keeps Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense.
2) Closes Guantanamo Bay.
3) Appoints Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court (Face it: in the likely 8 years of Obama there is the possibility of having to replace Stevens, Ginsburg, and maybe even Scalia).
I bet Grover that she’ll be appointed while she’s still his Dean. I also made the note that after 8 years of executive experience (as President), 12 years of legislative experience (Illinois/US Senate), and 12 years lecturing in constitutional law, in 2017 when he’d turn 58, maybe he’d pull a Taft and serve on the Supreme Court!
Other than Obama, I look forward to seeing Bush’s list of pardons.
Now four minor rants:
1) The Big Three automakers need to suck it up (have you seen their worthless stock?). They’ve got billions of handouts over decades. Both the companies and the CAW/UAW hold responsibility and maybe Chapter 11 and court supervised restructuring is what needs to be done. I’ve worked for two of the Big Three: they have ineffective management, inefficient manufacturing, and poor innovation. Things need to change and it is going to hurt for a while before it gets better.
2) Will the NHL just give Balsillie a franchise? It is clear that he’d be able to run a much more profitable and popular one up here, say in Hamilton.
3) While Nurse Practitioners are a great move in alleviating the burden on our strained health system and its Doctors, hurry up and give Pharmacists reasonable prescription privileges. My Pharmacist knows me and my drug history much better than the Doctors I end up seeing (my family doctor retired) and even on just routine refills I’d rather have my Pharmacist deal with it.
4) Lastly, I am still unsure where I stand on competition law. A Facebook note I wrote only resulted with Grover’s suggestion to buy a textbook, which is a little overboard for me. I’ve read Friedman’s views, and I know I have a Greenspan essay on the topic somewhere in a book on my shelf in Waterloo, but it is recent events that make me seem to lean against the current antitrust law. The classic case being the Microsoft/Internet Explorer one to which I personally side with Microsoft. It seems silly to me to demand a company to provide exactly what you want (e.g. OS w/o Browser).
Earlier this year, Amazon got slapped by French competition law (My impression is the EU’s Antitrust laws are way overboard, but I’m still learning about them), and now Google pulled out of a deal with Yahoo over concerns of antitrust challenges. In these two cases how are customers and shareholders benefiting by the laws? Yahoo’s stock is tanking and there are renewed talks of Microsoft acquiring them. For consumers, isn’t an advertising deal better than having an entire firm acquired by a competitor? Is it really that bad that Amazon offers free shipping on a minimum purchase (as an avid Amazon customer I can say it’s the kind of service I want)?
Okay; enough ranting. I do appreciate discussion. I have nothing better to do than hack out my lungs.
Currently Listening to: Landslide - Smashing Pumpkins
Random Wikipedia Article: - Portuguese Man o’ War