Thu 27 Nov 2008
You can’t hide your lyin’ eyes and your smile is a thin disguise
Posted by Jeff under Jeff's Thoughts1 Comment
A few follow-ups from my last post:
1) Gates looks like he will remain as Secretary of Defense.
2) More calls for prescription privileges to Pharmascists.
3) An interesting graph comparing the American Big Three with the Japanese Big Three.
4) Bush made a few pardons.
New comments:
1) I have favourable views of the Clinton, Holder, Axelrod, Geithner, Romer, Summers, and Volcker for their respective proposed positions. I feel much better now that Obama won’t do anything drastically protectionist given his team of economic advisers.
2) I like Obama’s civil rights agenda. Please note his approval of the repealing of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. It’s a silly policy that loses money and skilled members of the military.
3) I oppose the proposed new Ontario driving laws. At their core, they are blatantly ageist, and at the least should have been based on years of experience than age. Other issues are the negative impacts on car-pooling, and designated drivers. Again, it’s just MADD imposing their neo-prohibitionist and anti-civil liberties agenda on the public through lobbying. Shame on McGuinty. I’ve made known it long ago that I despise MADD, and I discourage anyone from donating to them given their policies and 81% overhead.
4) I oppose the cut to federal party public financing. I have mixed feelings about this though. Generally I despise public campaign funding. It’s absurd to just give out money to just anyone to campaign; you have to be able to produce some level of support, including monetary support. On the other hand, this is an after the election result tied to actual votes. It’s not a blind handout to any wannabee politician out there. It’s been highly advertised and people have factored it into their voting. It’s played a factor in getting people to vote for their party over compromising, and I can appreciate that goal.
The money is actually very little and for a program that I somewhat like. Of course, it will effectively kill the Green Party, who, having made significant gains in popular vote and running candidates in every riding should now be considered a notable federal party. I guess I sort of felt that the incentive helped to fight the paradox of voting. I tend to think this will have a negative effect on voter turn out, which is quickly becoming an issue we need to address.
Chrétien introduced the changes (to which, if I remember correctly, Martin has bashed for crippling the Liberal party) to end corporate and union donations, which I highly favour. I’ll note that I’m a Liberal Party member and supporter and, yes, my party does benefit from this financing. All parties do. Seems to me though like a political power move over relatively no money that disproportionately affects the opposition parties during a time when personal donations will be lower due to the recession.
I’ll defend Harper until my throat is sore over the responsible act of running a federal deficit, but this is a program that shouldn’t be cut. It’s not really pork, but allows for parties to develop new policy, well worth the money in a time when we need to think outside the box to fight this recession. To tie it to a confidence vote would be a political move that I think is petty when the parties should be working together on more inportant topics. Instead of eliminting this spending (be wary of reducing spending at all during recessions), eliminate the penny; that will save some money.
Currently Listening to: Lyin’ Eyes - Eagles
Random Wikipedia Article: Puntland